Moon Sweepers reaches No. 2; CRACK enters the observed top 100 | October 27 evening
Asia/Shanghai · Frozen at 19:35; actual source times retained per item
Judgment and time basis
In comparable US top-100 seller snapshots from 00:54 to 09:35 Beijing time on October 27, Moon Sweepers moved 4→2 and CRACK appeared at No. 16. Evening store checks confirm cleaning or striking loops tied to tool upgrades. A Hongguo bodyguard series moved 10→3 in its AI-drama chart.
The following separates official descriptions, normal reviews and analytical hypotheses. It is not a play-test or development authorization. Regular CNY prices were not verified, so no sample is claimed as a verified sub-60-yuan recommendation; developer names and Indie tags do not establish solo teams.
CRACK / 破壳行动
CRACK enters the observed US top 100 at No. 16. Rafoli gives up to four players a clear task: break open a giant laboratory egg while upgrading tools and discovering hidden rooms. The current store shows October 27 while the earlier release list shows October 26; that date discrepancy remains unresolved.
Developer / publisher: Rafoli / Rafoli
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:22:39.988Z UTC · ID 4312190
Input and feedback：Strike the giant egg, explore the laboratory and upgrade tools. The official description says the egg reacts, but impact feel, sound and timing were not tested.
Goals and progression：The announcement confirms hidden areas, multiple endings, 40 achievements including 5 hidden ones, and a speedrun leaderboard. These support progression beyond striking; actual content depth and ending conditions were not tested.
Resource economy：The October 24 developer announcement describes earning currency with each strike, then buying better tools, automated robots, explosives and scaffolding. Prices, production rates and balance are untested.
Player evidence and limits：On October 24 the developer reported 120,000 wishlists and said some tools followed comments. These are historical first-party claims, not current backend counts or independent demand validation. Corrected normal recent zh-TW extraction still yielded no text and no matching total; this is not evidence of zero reviews or no pain points.
Counterevidence and friction：October 27 developer patch notes mention camera-motion options, graphics-card visibility, connection waits and softlocks. These are developer-stated issues and fixes, not sampled player complaints or verified resolutions.
Who would click and why：For players who enjoy probing a mysterious object with friends, each strike visibly changing the target is the hook.
A truthfully filmable promise：Show a real strike, response, upgrade and newly accessible space; do not promise unsupported multiplayer.
H5 constraints：A single-player strike→visible change→tool upgrade→small-area exploration loop is a testable hypothesis. Co-op networking, a 3D facility and mystery content remain significant costs.
Advertising and natural pauses：Hypothesis only: a pause after an upgrade or room reveal. Actual advertising and frequency are unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Early release; the official introductory discount ends November 3, but remaining attention is unknown.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Use original assets for one egg, three tools and two discoverable rooms; test whether clear cause and effect encourages exploration rather than waiting for numbers. Do not copy protected story or laboratory expression.
Veto conditions：Stop if impacts lack meaningful feedback, exploration rewards feel unrelated to actions, or the appeal relies on multiplayer that the project cannot support.
Moon Sweepers moved from 4th to 2nd in the comparable US top-seller observation. Its clean-haul-upgrade loop shows both appealing early progression and late-game automation concerns in the 10 normal recent reviews.
Developer / publisher: DragDrop Games / DragDrop Games
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:24:52.814Z UTC · ID 5335510
Input and feedback：Brush lunar ground, collect dust, haul it to stations and launch shipments for payment. Ground cleanup provides visible feedback; handling was not tested.
Goals and progression：Upgrade tools, carrying capacity and vehicles, and place collection stations to reduce travel. Official support includes solo play and up to 16-player co-op.
Resource economy：Clean, haul, sell and reinvest; yields and automation balance remain untested.
Player evidence and limits：The first 10 normal recent zh-TW reviews contain 6 recommendations and 4 non-recommendations. Early progression receives support, while some recommended reviews still report weak late-game motivation.
Counterevidence and friction：Reviews 1/3/4/5/7 discuss weak late progression or automation; 6/8 concern input-side confusion; 9 reports camera-linked brushing discomfort. This is a bounded sample, not prevalence.
Who would click and why：Players attracted to visible cleaning and efficiency upgrades may click to see a dirty area become clean and fund a better tool.
A truthfully filmable promise：Record cleaning, delivery and demonstrably faster cleanup after an upgrade; do not fake progress by skipping the loop.
H5 constraints：Test a fixed-camera small map with cleaning, delivery and upgrades before considering large 3D worlds or 16-player synchronization.
Advertising and natural pauses：Delivery settlement or finishing one area is a hypothetical natural break; source-game ad behavior is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Released October 23; introductory offer ends October 31 and ranking evidence ends 09:35 China time.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Use original assets, three dirty areas, two meaningful upgrades and a short delivery loop; verify visible speed gains without brush-linked camera motion.
Veto conditions：Reject if upgrades mainly prolong repetition, cleanup scale overwhelms rewards, or a fixed camera obscures interaction.
REKA lists its full release as October 26 after entering Early Access in 2024. Its walking home connects exploration, gathering and furnishing.
Developer / publisher: Emberstorm Entertainment / Fireshine Games / Shochiku
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:28:39.698Z UTC · ID 1737870
Input and feedback：Gather materials, build and furnish a walking chicken-legged home, explore villages, craft remedies and food, and invite animal companions.
Goals and progression：Home expansion, furniture and village quests structure exploration. This is a 1.0 transition, not a first-ever release.
Resource economy：Materials feed construction and crafting; exact costs, rewards and 1.0 balance remain unknown.
Player evidence and limits：All 8 returned normal recent reviews recommend the game and are explicitly Early Access reviews; they support the mobile home, setting and relaxed exploration, not 1.0 outcomes.
Counterevidence and friction：Six historical EA reviews request Chinese localization; one asks for more varied NPCs and quests. The latest shows June 12 without a year; others date to 2024/2025. Do not treat them as current-language coverage evidence.
Who would click and why：Players drawn to mobile homes, decoration and peaceful exploration may click for a home that carries their collection on a journey.
A truthfully filmable promise：Show real decoration changes and a travel stop, not an unsupported folklore open world.
H5 constraints：Explore an original mobile-home gather-decorate-travel loop; full 3D construction, folklore writing and animation remain costly.
Advertising and natural pauses：Stops and construction settlement are hypothetical breaks; actual ads are unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Full release October 26, discount through November 7; historical EA reviews do not validate the new version.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：One customizable room and two travel stops; test whether decorating changes the next exploration goal.
Veto conditions：Stop if the appeal cannot be delivered without extensive narrative or freeform 3D building.
Planned for October 28, Probably Stolen puts item appraisal and rising rent at the same counter: riskier trades offer both higher margins and harder consequences.
Developer / publisher: Questing Goose Studio / tinyBuild
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:30:13.905Z UTC · ID 4348910
Input and feedback：Inspect goods, assess authenticity and quality, haggle, craft and trade; approve, refuse or report customers with faction consequences.
Goals and progression：Earn enough to cover rising rent and buy the shop. High margins carry inspection, confiscation and reputation risk; this was not playtested.
Resource economy：Purchases, crafting, sales and rent create cash-flow pressure. The description says missed rent reduces shop appeal and traffic.
Player evidence and limits：The unreleased store page reports no user reviews; promotional claims and curator counts do not substitute for player evidence.
Counterevidence and friction：No current player pain points were obtained; constraints below are design hypotheses, not review findings.
Who would click and why：Appraisal and shop-management players may click to see whether a deal can cover today’s rent.
A truthfully filmable promise：Show visible clues, a buy-or-refuse choice and profit settlement, not arbitrary twists.
H5 constraints：An original benign-goods inspect-price-settle loop is testable; faction writing, production chains and combat are not automatically low-cost.
Advertising and natural pauses：A stage or day settlement is a hypothetical break; source-game advertising is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Planned October 28 launch is a foreseeable near-term window; post-launch demand is unknown.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Use three fictional everyday goods, two visible clues each, five trades and one rent settlement; test whether players can explain profit through judgment.
Veto conditions：Reject if clues are opaque, success requires memorized narrative, or the pitch relies on crime spectacle rather than inspection feedback.
Fantasy World Manager currently plans an October 29 Early Access launch. The earlier list showed October 28; that difference is retained without inferring a delay.
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:30:37.895Z UTC · ID 3447280
Input and feedback：Create terrain, races, cultures, factions and characters, then run and observe a simulation or control creatures.
Goals and progression：The developer describes an EA foundation with 18 classes, 21 biomes and multiple editors. Roughly one year of EA, additional modes and possible Workshop support are plans, not delivered guarantees.
Resource economy：Detailed simulated resource rules are not fully described; unknown.
Player evidence and limits：The unreleased store page reports no user reviews; promotional claims and curator counts do not substitute for player evidence.
Counterevidence and friction：No current player pain points were obtained; constraints below are design hypotheses, not review findings.
Who would click and why：Sandbox players interested in rules changing a world may click for a legible consequence of one intervention.
A truthfully filmable promise：Record one rule change and its effect on two villages; do not present scripted outcomes as a fully dynamic simulation.
H5 constraints：Test small interventions with legible consequences, not a full-world simulation and extensive editors. A personal developer credit does not establish team size.
Advertising and natural pauses：A stage or day settlement is a hypothetical break; source-game advertising is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Current EA plan October 29 versus earlier feed October 28; describe this as a scheduled, not completed, launch.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Two villages, three resources and one player rule change; test whether players can trace the cause of conflict or cooperation within ten minutes.
Veto conditions：Reject if interesting outcomes require excessive systems or collapse into unexplained randomness.
Usagi Shima plans its Steam launch for October 29, linking island decoration with rabbit visits, care, friendship mementos and photos.
Developer / publisher: studio rabbiko / studio rabbiko / Wholesome Games Presents
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:31:01.582Z UTC · ID 3144010
Input and feedback：Place decorations to attract rabbits, feed and groom them, build friendship, earn mementos and take photos.
Goals and progression：The official page promises more than 35 rabbits, 100 decorations, real-time ambience and rare visitors without time pressure.
Resource economy：Decoration and friendship structure progression; currency, spending and monetization details are unknown. Do not import assumptions from other versions.
Player evidence and limits：The unreleased store page reports no user reviews; promotional claims and curator counts do not substitute for player evidence.
Counterevidence and friction：No current player pain points were obtained; constraints below are design hypotheses, not review findings.
Who would click and why：Animal-care and decorating players may click to learn which layout attracts whom and what interaction leaves behind.
A truthfully filmable promise：Show actual decoration, a visit and a friendship memento; do not turn random waiting into a guaranteed instant arrival.
H5 constraints：Decorate-visit-interact-memento fits short inputs, but hand-drawn animation and differentiated animal content still require production capacity.
Advertising and natural pauses：A stage or day settlement is a hypothetical break; source-game advertising is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Steam version planned October 29; this is not a verified first release across all platforms.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Three original animals, six decorations and one clear visit condition; test whether players understand the layout-visit link and want to save actual gameplay images.
Veto conditions：Reduce or reject if visits rely mainly on waiting, interactions lack differentiation, or emotional reward requires excessive art volume.
Released October 15, Brick by Brick rebuilds a town through sorting and building plans. It moved from 56th to 64th in the comparable US top-seller observation, which does not establish commercial failure.
Developer / publisher: PaperPixel Games / PaperPixel Games
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:31:25.363Z UTC · ID 5228920
Input and feedback：Collect and sort bricks by shape and color, then place them against building plans. Shrinking piles and completed buildings provide visible feedback.
Goals and progression：The official description offers 18,490 bricks and a rebuilding town, solo or up to 5-player co-op. Magnets, carts and scaffolds reduce hauling effort.
Resource economy：Skill unlocks improve collection and building; exact unlock costs and pacing are unknown.
Player evidence and limits：All 5 normal recent zh-TW reviews contain 3 recommendations and 2 non-recommendations. Reviews 1/5 support section completion and magnet efficiency; 4 praises developer responsiveness, not independently verified fixes.
Counterevidence and friction：Review 3, dated October 19, complains about no-error achievement requirements, no skill-carryover restart and saving on exit. Persistence in the current version is unknown. Review 2 uses exaggerated castle-workload language, not a reliable mechanical-failure diagnosis.
Who would click and why：Sorting and building-plan players may click for the transformation from loose pieces to a complete small building.
A truthfully filmable promise：Show sorting, placement and completion rather than only a finished-building reveal.
H5 constraints：Test a small fixed-camera sort-place-complete scene, not an assumed full-town first-person or 5-player networking solution.
Advertising and natural pauses：A stage or day settlement is a hypothetical break; source-game advertising is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Released October 15, discount through October 30; this interval’s rank decline does not establish failure.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：Thirty original geometric pieces, three colors and one building; test whether sorting and placement involve decisions rather than repetitive dragging.
Veto conditions：Reject if plans are unreadable, placement is trial and error, or co-op is essential but unaffordable.
Cozy Game Restoration currently plans a November 5 launch, connecting unboxing and restoration with a collectible display. The earlier list showed November 4; retain both without inferring a delay.
Official detail observed: 2026-10-27T11:33:08.537Z UTC · ID 3581230
Input and feedback：Unbox, peel labels and use tools on dust, ink, yellowing and scratches. Layered before-and-after surface changes are demonstrable; tactile quality is untested.
Goals and progression：The page describes 108 retro-inspired cartridges, rare variants, collection tasks and furniture rewards for a display room. In-game calendar tasks are not real-world event deadlines.
Resource economy：Restoration and collection tasks reward decor. Rare unboxing exists, but real-money purchases, odds and payment entry points are unknown; do not call it paid gacha.
Player evidence and limits：The unreleased store page reports no user reviews; promotional claims and curator counts do not substitute for player evidence.
Counterevidence and friction：No current player pain points were obtained; constraints below are design hypotheses, not review findings.
Who would click and why：Restoration and collection-display players may click for layered cleaning and a visible before-and-after change.
A truthfully filmable promise：Record peeling, cleaning and displaying the same original object; do not rely on protected cartridge art for clicks.
H5 constraints：Local objects, layered dirt and tool matching suit a short loop. The two-button mouse and wheel camera requirements need separate touch validation. Packaging and names must be original or licensed.
Advertising and natural pauses：A stage or day settlement is a hypothetical break; source-game advertising is unknown.
Reachable channels：Observed Steam store/chart surfaces are discovery paths. Original real-gameplay short videos are a channel hypothesis; reach costs are unverified.
Remaining window：Currently planned November 5 versus feed November 4; a later-window upcoming observation, not a released game.
Competition and differentiation：This released or announced product is existing supply. Four normal query groups were not completed, so strongest substitutes are not exhaustively established. A lighter view or shorter loop is only a differentiation hypothesis, not a market-gap finding.
Low-cost test：One original collectible, three surface problems and three tools; show actual before-and-after footage and test understandable tool choice within a minute.
Veto conditions：Reject if appeal relies on protected nostalgic IP, real interaction cannot deliver the footage, or touch precision is inadequate.
ID 972008 has heat 88,109, above the 10,000 watch threshold but not a success guarantee; prior heat was 87,258, with rating 9/231 ratings. First release, stage and normal comments remain unknown, so age/150D and player-pain claims are not computed. Older watch IDs 950891/948470/947623 were not sampled this issue; player needs and pain triggers remain unconfirmed.
Sampling ran from 19:00 to 19:34 Beijing time and froze early at 19:35; the 20:00 cutoff and 21:00 publication target were not shifted. Saved Steam feeds contain 819 rows across chart, calendar and detail surfaces, alongside 50 Baidu rows and 257 creator facts. Source times are around 09:29–09:50 Beijing time; consumption at 19:00 does not change them. Direct Steam lists show 725 rows (675 recent, 50 future), retaining overlap with feeds and other pages. Recent reservations reached 1,000 rows/40 logical pages; actual feed-plus-direct displays total 974/39. Direct dates cover only October 23–27. Future reservations are 150/6, with direct dates October 27–30; the next link dropped scope parameters, so it was not requested. The target past window October 13–26, separate October 27 and future October 28–November 10 are not fully covered. All eight details were read; three released samples yielded 23 normal recent-order zh-TW reviews. CRACK returned neither review text nor a matching total; this does not establish zero reviews.
Weibo at 19:02 yielded 50 ranked topics, one pinned and two promoted rows; Douyin yielded 50 ranked topics and one pinned row. Four Hongguo charts at 19:03–19:04 contain 80 rows and 60 unique series, not independent trends; the displayed update day is not a statistical date. Twelve Fanqie categories contain 120 rows. Titles, IDs and reading figures for 36 entries were screenshot-verified; 84 PUA titles remain null/unverified. Its statistical date is still October 26: 40 fixed-category rows are same-statistical-day checks, while 80 rotating-category rows only expand coverage. Existing stop guards for itch.io, Bilibili/Gengbaike, Kuaishou and TapTap APIs were retained without another attempt; these are not new failures. Saved TapTap creator facts do not replace complete charts, the seven-day calendar or reviews for the three older watch items. Spend, downloads, revenue and current wishlist counts remain null when unknown.
Review evidence
Moon: 10 reviews (six recommended/four not recommended; eight substantive). Brick: five (three/two; an exaggerated castle complaint is not automatically a pain point). REKA: eight, all older EA reviews. All follow normal recent order under the current guest zh-TW language filter, without negative-keyword selection. REKA’s latest displays June 12 without an inferred year; these do not establish 1.0 reception. CRACK yielded no review text and an unknown matching count. The four unreleased base games display no reviews; demo feedback is not substituted.
Upstream top-ten triage
These ten leads are editorial triage across observed evidence, not a cross-platform heat ranking, ten confirmed opportunities or an independent-trend count.
1. Limited identity checks to identify impostors
Newly observed; verification pending
Overall rank 10 and comics rank 4 refer to the same series. A new-drama label is not a verified premiere date. The official synopsis describes one daily identity check or survival-information choice.
Show how each check changes a logically deducible conclusion rather than requiring a random identity guess.
2. Close protection and the return of a powerful protector
Up over the observed interval; verification pending
The AI-drama rank moved from 10 to 3 and composite heat from 56.98 million to 65.37 million. Its newly observed overall rank 6 is another surface for the same work, not an independent second trend.
Show a character repositioning to block an actual attack and escort a target to safety.
The new fashion-week topic ranks 6th, while the older runway topic moved from 43 to 48 and from 7.652 million to 7.618 million in heat. This does not establish accelerating spread across the family.
Transform the same original doll and show it on a turntable, without using another creator’s doll or protected assets.
The overall and comics number-one positions belong to one work; composite heat moved from 86.02 million to 86.86 million. Existing story supply is observed, but competitive game supply has not been queried, so an underserved market is not established.
Allocate one limited resource among family members and visibly change their aid or development in the next stage.
The work ranks 1st in reading category 0_2_746 with 1.059 million displayed as reading, for the October 26 statistical date. This newly rotated entry has no comparable baseline.
Use routes and asymmetric information to decide which reward to reach first; do not reduce the promise to unconditional reward clicks.
8. Cultivation from humble beginnings and artifact collection
Same-statistical-date check; crowding unverified
Reading-category rank 2 and the displayed reading figure of 414,000 match the morning statistical date. A similarly named Hongguo work must not be merged into the same IP without verification.
Converting materials into an artifact must involve resource trade-offs and visible feedback, not just a thematic label.
The saved Baidu source ranks this topic 28th with a hot-search score of 5,232,056. Preserve its earlier source observation time rather than presenting it as a live 19:00 chart.
Choose ingredients, skewer them, control the sugar coating and show the actual result; do not advertise combinations the game cannot produce.
These are traceable leads, not independently verified news or game demand. Multiple topics about one event remain one propagation family, with no addition of incompatible heat metrics.
Conditional judgments and vetoes
Zero completed deep investigations and zero confirmed opportunities. The following two items are conditional validation drafts. Two independent normal-comment sources and four top-ten supply-query groups remain incomplete; these are not authorization for development or ads.
Deduction with a limited identity check
who_why_click: Players who enjoy identity reversals and deduction may click on how one check could save the group; this is a hypothesis to test.
real_playable_promise: A scene with five characters and one identity-check or information choice. Consistent clues must eliminate at least one dangerous option.
action_reward: Check, cross-reference, choose a companion, reveal the actual identity and resolve survival; do not secretly randomize identities to force failure.
reachable_channel: Original short gameplay demonstrations and candidate search terms about impostors or identity checks. Actual reach is unknown.
window: Unconfirmed. Do not borrow the drama’s title, characters or IP. Stop investing in the topical angle if a 3–7 day validation window yields no relevant independent creators or demand in comments.
differentiation_hypothesis: One valuable information decision rather than repetitive document checking. This difference must be tested against competing supply.
cheap_validation: A five-minute interactive test using original static clue cards; record whether participants can explain the inference. This does not authorize development dispatch or a project launch.
veto: Reject if players can only guess, clues are inexplicable, released competitors already satisfy the need without an achievable difference, or the concept requires copying protected stories.
Restoring and restyling an old doll
who_why_click: People interested in low-cost before-and-after transformations may click on a ten-second makeover of the same doll. Actual demand is unverified.
real_playable_promise: An original doll with three replaceable parts and color changes; the final rotating display must match the changes actually made.
action_reward: Disassemble, recolor and combine parts within a limited budget, then save the resulting appearance. Do not substitute fake video effects for interaction.
reachable_channel: Original vertical makeover footage and doll-customization search terms. There is no verified account reach or advertising-performance evidence.
window: A new topic appears in the same propagation family while an older one declines. Three to seven days is only a validation window, not a promise that attention will persist.
differentiation_hypothesis: Hands-on repair that retains and addresses an old doll’s imperfections, not merely a cosmetic outfit swap. Supply has not been queried, so this distinction is unconfirmed.
cheap_validation: Compare genuine before-and-after footage of self-made parts with a small interaction-comprehension test. No launch or automatic advertising.
veto: Reject if appeal comes only from someone else’s brand or IP, people want passive viewing rather than interaction, production exceeds the bounded test, or competitive research reveals no meaningful difference.
Whole pool and comparison boundaries
All observed platform/ID candidates merge into 1,297 items: 1,235 Steam and 62 TapTap, not independent lightweight games. Types include 247 games, eight DLCs, one soundtrack, one software item and 1,040 unknowns. The 380 additional UI IDs mean wider coverage only. Overlapping screens flag 31 two-snapshot top-ten items, 196 newly seen/rising, 103 falling and 340 date-window leads. Two points do not establish acceleration; absence refers only to the scanned prefix. High position does not establish remaining opportunity, and low attention does not mean failure.
Fanqie still displays an October 26 statistical date. The top three reading figures in each of the four fixed representative categories match the morning report; eight rotating categories expand coverage rather than prove new chart entries. One third-place reading count was corrected from a transcription of 446,000 to the screenshot/DOM value of 176,000, with the correction retained.
Image provenance and research limits
Only historical official Moon Sweepers artwork is reused, acquired October 21, 2026 at 23:33 UTC; its standalone asset URL was not preserved (null). The 375×175 JPEG is a historical screenshot re-encoding, SHA-256 33ab02068d423045bce5f65abefabdb0bbb96bb6e1e15dcf20ab734bc9bfa731. No games were downloaded or play-tested, no code/assets extracted, no ads placed or PM work dispatched. Raw packages remain private.